Top 5 things I’d like to see Obama do

These are more pet issues that the world saving ideas that top other lists, but they’d make a significant difference in America and in it’s sphere of influence.

1. Trade with Cuba
The trade embargo has allowed a despot to drive his country into abject poverty, and kill thousands.  Trade will increase - and would have increased - the influence of outside ideas, including ideas of fundamental freedoms that would help Cubans push Fidel and his mafia out of power.

2. Remove Iran from the Axis of Evil list
Before Bush and co. created the Axis of Evil, Iran was marching solidly towards a new enlightenment, with a blossoming of creative media, fostering the start of openess with the world.  Adding them to the list helped put a warmongering mouthpiece in power and increased the danger to Iran’s burgeoning middle-class and it’s geographical neighbours.  Without a large enemy that can be used by the Supreme Council to oppress Iranians, some openess should re-emerge.

3. Legalize Marijuana
Skipping the obvious improvements that such a move would bring (e.g. fewer people in prison), relaxing of marijuana laws would reduce future crime and bring a huge business segment into the main stream market, increasing employment and available tax base.  It would also allow close allies, i.e. Canada, to finally do the same.

4. Work to improve the lot of Mexicans in Mexico
If the US spent a fraction of their Iraq war, helping to reduce corruption, improve economic investment and reduce risk (read some de Soto), it would do more to lower illegal immigration than any network of walls.  It would also improve general incomes of Mexicans, which in turn will help improve the environment, health, and life expectancy.

5. Extend NAFTA
Protectionism is not conducive to economic growth.  The US, instead of turtling in, should extend their openess - to not just improve American incomes but those of their trading partners.  It should be true free trade, not tied pseudo aid/investment that mostly passes for help, but an openess that increases opportunities the world over.



Anything here rankle you? Feeling overly perturbed or elated? Leave a comment below. or subscribe to the Sauce Captain feed.

Comments

Todd,

C’mon, man. I don’t think the trade embargo has ‘allowed’ a despot to drive his country into abject poverty. Castro may not be a saint, but the US repression of Cuba goes back to the days of the Platt Amendment. The USA has never had an interest in a free, democratic, or self-determined Cuba. The current state of economic affairs of Cuba, without bending over and taking it from the States, is almost inevitable.

And Iran was well on its way to enlightenment in 1953, when the USA thought it was in their best interest to overthrow Mossaddeq and reinstate the Shah. Danger? What the hell is Iran going to do? And what business does the US have in the middle east, anyways?

Forget about interfering with Mexico. Why not grant Mexicans in the USA citizenship? I know, it’s because the idea of slavery is alive and well in the USA. Except now the term ’slave’ is replaced with euphemisms like ‘nanny’ and ‘gardener’.

Is your alias Bill O’Reilly?

Take care!
Steve

Hey Steve, thanks for contributing!

I’m pretty sure you didn’t actually read what I posted - or you just assume, very incorrectly, that I’m a pro-US-imperialist redneck and read it through those glasses. There’s nothing in my post that Bill O’Reilly would agree with Steve. There’s little in my entire blog that O’Reilly would agree with.

Amnesty International and other organizations have well documented evidence of political prisoners and disappearances - spend some time and you’ll find about thousands who have been disappeared. Castro is a thug and the lack of open trade and movement between the countries due to the US trade embargo merely handed him more power - it’s easy to crack down on the population in a hermit kingdom. I’m advocating openness - and hence I can’t see why your statements mentioning Platt contradict that. Let me know how open international trade (on things and ideas) would hurt Cuba, a country with one of the lowest per capita incomes and HDIs on the planet. Unless of course you believe that because health care is free there that Cubans are undeserving (or even undesirous) of a G20 standard of living.

As for Iran, same thing. I’m advocating openness regardless of the past and you’re almost quoting off topic. Removing the explicit threat that the Axis-of-Evil tag puts on Iran would remove many excuses that the Supreme Council has to crack down on the burgeoning, literate middle class, allowing open ideas to better flourish in the country. So you either agree that Axis label causes problems in Iran or not - if you do, the influence is negative and should be removed, or you don’t and the US can/should keep the label around. Why would this imply I support US intervention in the middle east? I’m advocating for the removal of a label that is causing serious affects on Iran and it’s citizens.

And again on Mexico, if Mexico wasn’t so corrupt and poor, due in part to US policies, fewer people would risk their lives trying to cross the border. The drug war is directly responsible for the hundreds that are being killed near the US border, by both gangs and the policy. If you read others posts of mine you’ll see that I advocate quite open immigration - which implicitly accepts granting citizenship (or at least status) in destination countries - along with the legalization of drugs. The US interferes with Mexico already in very drastic and mostly negative ways.

I’m confused Steve. Let me know what you think. And, be careful - no where do I state that the US is all good. I mention specific policies and only their negative affect on other countries.

Todd,

I have to agree that, upon re-reading your entry, I was perhaps not quite on track, and it being past my bed-time, leapt to some conclusions. My apologies for the O’Reilly comment. Not necessary.

Yes, I agree that a lift in the Cuba trade embargo is absolutely in Cuba’s bests interest and good policy. Yes, I agree that removing Iran from the ‘Axis of Evil’ is in Iran’s best interest and good policy. USA investment in Mexico, though, is not a policy I endorse at this point.

Maybe next time I will read, re-read, then go away before writing!

Quick-trigger Pieroway out!

Hey Steve - glad to know that you don’t lump me in with those labeled neo-con or whatever the new word running around happens to be.

[...] can manage to keep up on, and will relaunch the blog with more pithy witticisms that are sometimes viewed as fascist.  The aim will to be to build a more focused topic set that will resonate with people more [...]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.